pxanon replied to your photoset: It’s like lame white boy appropriation is…
Um, I can at least attest to the fact that the two in the poster at the top are not white.
It’s not so much whether they’re white or not. It’s the fact they’re using models of color and this chicano/hard thug look for a bear party.
the whole pseudo-chicano look thing feels really off here
They are not serving butch realness with this bullshit image. Come be a fat mess with us fake cholo wannabe bitches.
Butch parade table of none. Pass. I’d rather do the Eagle.
Meanwhile in SF those bitches were just all about the buffet. Sex? No thanks there’s pie.
Pie is great but cock is zero calorie.
this is why I fucking hate it when people talk about “realness” in any sort of serious sense - I find it so presumptuous and haughty and, like in these comments from bearsimdisappointedin and voguefemme (both of whom I usually really enjoy, btw), more a reflection upon the commenter rather than any insight into what’s “real”.
We were commenting on the appropriation of chicano looks for a bear party flyer-not realness.
(Source: yetimenace)
pxanon replied to your photo: “BUDDIES”
I was in New York for 8 years and I’ve been an adult gay male in San Francisco for 5 months; in the 5 months I’ve been here I’ve met far more approachable and decent people than the 8 years there. Just sayin.
NYC is hard mode.

SF is easy mode.

You obviously took the easy way out.


